data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ef34/3ef34a9786bb9f3baabf6a1cb790a300a905fc2f" alt=""
If this election were a group project, Juan Munoz just became the student who actually read the rubric, Nate Goetz is still trying to charm his way through, and Abdul Abbasi is steadfastly sticking to the slides from last semester.
Another forum wrapped up in the University of Alberta Students’ Union’s (SU) vice-president (external) (VPX) race on February 27. With it, the dynamic of the campaign has taken a notable shift. Munoz found a way to revitalize his platform and capitalize on fresh talking points. Meanwhile, Goetz failed to break away from his stagnant campaign, leaving him trailing behind. Abbasi, the current VPX, remains steady in his approach. Whether this is a strength or a liability remains up for debate.
Goetz’s campaign primarily centred around the safety concerns of international students at this forum. His continued emphasis on public transit safety, while important, lacks a clear action plan or tangible strategies to push policy-makers into action. His response to tuition hikes also fell flat, as he conceded that there is little that can currently be done in terms of placing a cap on international tuition. While the honesty is appreciated, it effectively undercut his ability to advocate for meaningful change.
Rather than presenting an innovative solution, he leaned on vague promises of coalition-building. This strategy, without a concrete plan, offers little reassurance to students facing skyrocketing costs. He did advocate to create a space for international students to share their stories on social media. Though this is a great idea, it does not substitute for direct engagement with policymakers. Additionally, Goetz has maintained an approach that makes it seem like he is relying on being relatable and understanding, but that can only take him so far. Without a more policy-driven and solution-oriented platform, his campaign risks stagnation.
In contrast, Munoz finally broke free from the repetition that characterized his appearances at the previous forums. Instead of recycling his financial arguments, he pivoted toward broader advocacy initiatives, focusing on the retention of international students post-graduation. He proposed advocacy to reform the comprehensive ranking system (CRS) for permanent residency. This marks a shift toward policy-driven solutions rather than general financial rhetoric. This change in approach positions him as a candidate who is not only passionate but also capable of adapting to the demands of the role.
His willingness to push for transparency in financial aid for international students further adds to his credibility. Especially given the widespread confusion over existing support mechanisms. Munoz’s push for employer partnerships to provide international students with meaningful work opportunities introduces a concrete, forward-looking initiative that could have a lasting impact beyond his possible tenure.
Abbasi remains a steady force in the race. However, his consistency raises the question of whether he is evolving enough to meet the moment. His advocacy for food security grants and work-integrated learning (WIL) is commendable. But, his platform does not appear to have developed significantly from his past year as the previous VPX. Furthermore, the recently released provincial budget marks a significant challenge for his campaign. Too much reliance on claims to push for increased grants and funding from a provincial government that cannot support it may wash his platform down the drain.
Ongoing projects from his previous tenure rather than new initiatives may suggest reliability. Meanwhile, it does little to convince voters that he has fresh ideas to address international students’ concerns. With a campaign focused on practical, incremental changes, Abbasi’s approach may resonate with some. But in a race where adaptability is proving to be a major asset, his steadiness could cost him momentum. His measured approach might be effective in maintaining existing programs, but it lacks the bold vision necessary to inspire a significant shift in external advocacy efforts.
As the race tightens, it is becoming increasingly clear that Munoz has taken the opportunity to refine and expand his platform, making him the standout candidate in this forum. Goetz, meanwhile, has struggled to break new ground, and his lack of clear policy direction leaves him vulnerable. Abbasi, while consistent, risks being overshadowed by a more dynamic opponent. With the election approaching, the ability to grow and adapt may be the deciding factor in who ultimately wins the role of VPX.