August 18, 2014
Browse or download the PDF of our latest issue.

Get weekly news in your inbox!

Letter to the Editor: Don’t turn a blind eye to Hamas terrorism

Aug 16, 2014

(Re: Turning a blind eye to Palestine perpetuates Israeli violence by Mim Fatmi, Aug 7)

The Israel-Palestine conflict invokes sharp and passionate responses from everyone — scholars, religious leaders and politicians and average citizens. But some of these opinions are more nuanced and thoughtful than others. Sadly, many in the West choose to be ever so selective in the facts they relay and the discourse they construct. But because a defense of Israel can be hard to find, allow me to try and mount one below.

To try and discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without making mention of Hamas is to completely ignore a party to it. In doing so, one deliberately misrepresents reality. An opinion piece published in The Gateway suggests that “apparently if your ancestors survive a brutal Holocaust that shattered your people, you’ll likely become perpetrators of genocide on a nation you’ve been oppressing for decades.” This is perhaps the most egregious statement I have seen on the conflict. To suggest there is some deep-seated, psychological flaw in a specific population that predisposes them to “genocide” is wholly offensive. As we have seen in Europe, 70 years ago and today, seeking to single out a group of people as having some “flaw” is not something that we ought to be doing.

Let’s then move on to the oft-repeated calloused comparisons of deaths. This rhetoric is not constructive. Morality is not mathematics. This argument’s continuation implies that if only Hamas had killed more Israelis and got even, things would be better. Every death is a tragedy — to be mourned, not cold-heartedly equated. To avoid an in-depth discussion of material and tactics, it is sufficient to say one party does its damnedest to avoid killing civilians and warns them before an air strike, while the other one launches rockets in schools and hospitals.

That other side, of course, is Hamas: a widely recognzied terrorist organization that views the destruction of the state of Israel as a central goal of its existence. This is the same organization that uses aid sent to Gaza as a tool to manipulate innocent civilians and enable the construction of complex tunnels that facilitate incursions into Israel; the same organization that uses civilian facilities to launch rockets at Israeli population centers. To rail against the current blockade — which has absolutely negatively impacted the quality of life in Gaza — without addressing Israel’s impetus for it is to distort reality. Time and time again, Hamas has attempted to smuggle weapons and tools of war through border crossings and has used the aid meant for infrastructure to instead build and fortify its positions.

Critically important to this discussion is recognition that most Palestinians in Gaza do not support Hamas. In fact, before this conflict flared up again, Hamas’ popular support was at an all-time low. People realized that suicide bombing doesn’t lead to peace and were increasingly desperate for leadership that reflected this reality. In fact, you could argue that this conflict was an attempt by Hamas to shore up support, desperately hoping that needless death would bolster their backing among a fractured society.

I will admit: I’m reluctant to even address the repeated and abhorrent equivalencies that have been drawn between WWII Germany and Israel. This rhetoric cheapens the lives of those who fought against a murderous regime bent on world domination, responsible for the organized torture and slaughter of millions of people it viewed as inferior. Entertaining these comparisons only leads to cheap, uninformed discussion. So let’s dismiss ill-informed, deceptive rhetoric, and focus on facts and a way forward.

Both sides must make concessions. Israel must work with the Palestinian Authority to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution that enables both the growth of Palestinian businesses and restoration of Gaza’s infrastructure. A key step in this is continuing to improve opportunities for Palestinians to work in Israel, where there are better paying, more stable employment opportunities; a fact the majority of Palestinians recognize. But this can’t come at the expense of the Israeli citizens’ security or the existence of Israel itself.

Let’s open our eyes, all of us.

David Jones


The writer is full of anti-arab bias. Israel has more power in the conflict so it has to be morally wrong. There is no moral ambiguity, Israel is clearly wrong and is committing a holocaust.

Posted by Not a fascist on Aug 17, 2014

Big ups for David Jones.

I, much like the author, find it abhorrent that Palestinian activists use a disingenuous comparison between the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the actions of National Socialist Germany - i.e, the Holocaust - to further their argument. As much as Palestinians do have legitimate grievances, I challenge these activists to find and publicly present Israeli facilities dedicated to the systematic murder of Palestinian Arabs. In case they lack requisite historical knowledge I am referring to concentration camps, like the infamous facility in Auschwitz.

If pro-Palestinian activists want to be taken seriously, they should open their history textbooks and stop drawing incorrect analogies between the present conflict in the middle east and the holocaust.

Perhaps their inability to do this speaks to the true strength, or lack thereof, of the arguments they present.


Posted by Lukas R on Aug 17, 2014

It is not mathematics to point out that slaughtering hundreds of peoples to “protect” people who are obviously not, in fact, at risk due to their glaring lack of civilian fatalities is not moral, not necessary, and not productive. The fact that they are safe not because a threat doesn’t exist but because they are well equipped to protect themselves against it does not change the fact that they are in a power position and they are abusing that position in physically and emotionally abusing a captive population.

Posted by Yawning. on Aug 19, 2014

I fail to see the alleged “anti-Arab bias” in the above letter, especially since he pointed out that many Arabs in Gaza, in so far as they are involved in this political dispute at all, they want independence from Israel and from terrorist regimes.

Let’s look at basic facts: Gaza is the geographical location. Hamas is the organization battling the Israeli troops. Yes, civilians living in Gaza might support Hamas, but that is guilt by association (many support Fatah, and although they don’t support Israel they certainly aren’t being helped by Hamas!) Making an entire religion or ethnicity the enemy is too simplistic, and the writer seemed to recognize that.

That said, here are some questions for you regardless of your ethnicity and political allegiances: Do you support the civilians’ right to live in a free democratic society? In Gaza? In Israel? How do you think that can/should be accomplished?

Posted by s on Aug 20, 2014

Submit a comment

By submitting your comment here, you acknowledge that The Gateway reserves the right to publish your comment both online and in print. The Gateway also reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity when reprinted in the print edition, and to refuse publication (both online and in print) of any comment it deems racist, sexist, libellous or otherwise hateful in nature.

All comments must be approved by a moderator before they will be visible, and may take up to 48 hours to appear. Comments may be no longer than 5000 characters.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
daily dose

Liquid Energy: Rockstar Review


Faculty of Law proposes tuition increase

latest video

Doin’ You: Quick and easy tie dye

The Gateway shows you how to stylishly channel your summer festival attendance into psychedelic print.

latest podcast

Gateway Presents: Moving On

latest blog post

Liquid Energy: Rockstar Review


After many years of standing near the top of the market, Rockstar has developed various flavours to complement its original energy drink. In spite of these, it’s time to revisit the classic to determine whether it still stands up against its more eclectic brethren.

Comments: 0
latest gallery

Top Sports Photos 2013/2014

most popular