We're currently on study break. See you next Thursday with our legendary Purity Test!
Could this be a religion that attempts to actually practice what it preaches?
In our modern, civilized and politically correct world, discrimination on the basis of religion is frowned upon, to say the least. In fact, voicing predjudicial thoughts tends to give you an imaginary stamp on your forehead that reads “total prick.” But all rules have exceptions, and there’s one religion that remains fair game for discrimination and ridicule. I’m talking about comedy’s perpetual whipping boy, Scientology.
Just try starting a group conversation about Scientology. But be warned: you will hear phrases such as “Ohmygoditssuchascam” and “OhmygodTomCruise” repeated with nauseating regularity. If you happen to find yourself in exceptionally learned company (ie someone who’s read the Wikipedia article on it), that person may mention Scientology’s sci-fi novelist creator, L Ron Hubbard. Perhaps the tabloid reader of your group will bring up Katie Holmes or coo about how adorable Suri Cruise is, but other than that you should find your conversation will go in circles for an indefinite period of time.
I think we can safely say that the average person on this campus knows shit-all about a controversial religion that they all love to gossip about. If this were the case with any other religion, you can bet there would be something of an uproar, and multiple student groups would likely form. However, scientologists seems to be fairly quiet about their faith—could it be they’ve decided to take the moral high road so many religions preach about? Already then, it would seem, they’re actually better at being religious than the rest of us. Could this be a religion that attempts to actually practice what it preaches?
To answer that question, we must first understand what exactly Scientology does preach. Because in all seriousness, if one is going to talk about as touchy and personal a subject as religion, it’s best to be educated on the matter. So let’s talk about the actual teachings of Scientology, and not just the Comedy Network fodder.
Scientology preaches about knowledge and understanding. One of the first things you are told when you start to read about it is, don’t pass by something you don’t understand. Learn what it is and understand it before continuing on your way. If you’re reading a book and spy a word you’ve never seen, find out what it means before you keep reading. That way you’ll completely understand its implications in the sentence. Already it seems we can learn something from our friends the Scientologists: understanding things before we talk about them. What a revolutionary concept.
Scientologists say there are three things you have to attend to in your life and in this order: Being, Doing and Having. Being is your person—your soul, really. The first thing you need to do is determine who you are: Being is being aware and knowledgeable about yourself and your surroundings. Doing is your actions: once you have yourself under control you have to look at your actions and how they’re affecting the world around you. Finally there’s Having: that’s where you get to look at your material possessions and their place in this world. Know about your surroundings before you do anything to affect the world? You guys are probably right, these people are crazy.
One of the major critisms of Scientology is that there are mandatory fees for members of the church. It’s clearly a scam since you have to pay to get in, right? But let’s not forget that organized religions need funds to keep their churches afloat—they just rely on donations. Scientologists are no different: they just happen to be straightforward about their financial needs. I’d prefer that over the guilt-inducing glares of senior citizens when the donation basket is passed around.
So let’s take stock: be knowledgeable, know yourself, know the consequences of your actions and put your mental self before your material one. Lessons we should all take to heart. The bottom line is, if a religion is working to help people better themselves the rest of us are in no place to judge it, regardless of what crazy celebrities happen to follow it. L Ron Hubbard calls Scientology a battle against idiocy. So congratulations to all those of you who just love to talk about this scam religion: you guys get to be the opposing army.
-->
//
/* //
Comments
Scientology, whom Hubbard claims is a battle against idiocy, is denying my sister access to Scientology services, not because of anything she did, because her brother, me, has expressed opinions on Scientology of which the church does not approve. They will allow her back in, only if I sign an agreement promising never to "attack" Scientology again. Not only do they want me to cease "attacking" Scientology, they don't even want me to mention it, even if the communication is positive, if the communication involves the interenet.
To shed more light on this, please read my blog entitled, "My Promise To The Church Of Scientology", at thaddeusgadfly.com
Sincerely,
Thaddeus Gadfly
http://thaddeusgadfly.com
If you want to meet a piercingly sensible moral code, carefully read "The Way to Happiness" by Hubbard. Its 21 precepts are completely non-religious.
Who could argue with:
- Be Worthy of Trust
- Fulfill Your Obligations
- Do Not Murder
Each is followed by a short discussion of what happens when you do--and do not--heed the suggestion.
It's a morality based on consequences, not on theology.
People will argue endlessly about dogma. It's harder to refute the benefits and consequences of "Try to Treat Others as You Would Want Them to Treat You."
http://www.thewaytohappiness.org/
If you want to meet a piercingly sensible moral code, carefully read "The Way to Happiness" by Hubbard. Its 21 precepts are completely non-religious.
Who could argue with:
- Be Worthy of Trust
- Fulfill Your Obligations
- Do Not Murder
Each is followed by a short discussion of what happens when you do--and do not--heed the suggestion.
It's a morality based on consequences, not on theology.
People will argue endlessly about dogma. It's harder to refute the benefits and consequences of "Try to Treat Others as You Would Want Them to Treat You."
http://www.thewaytohappiness.org/
That's been the case not only with Scientology but with several subjects, celebrities etc.
It's refreshing that someone took a minute to find out a bit about what the subject actually is. It's a collection of information that one can use to do better in life.
Best,
Roger Harrison
(This page's features work far better in Mozilla than in IE7.)
(Apologies for my double post above. Entirely inadvertent. Ed., pls remove if you like.)
The head of the Galactic Confederation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 yrs ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet -- 178 billion on average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H Bomb on the principal volcanoes (Incident 2) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic Area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged." His name was Xenu.
– L. Ron Hubbard, OT III: Incident 1
Don't be fooled by this drivel. Ask the many people that have actually been in Scientology and reached the upper levels that reveal the drug-induced space-alien delusions of their founder. Secret level OT3 reveals that the worlds problems are a result of Galatic Overlord Xenu. Other Scientology course promise "Super Powers". It is all nonsensical snake oil.
Buyer beware!
1. DISCONNECTION: Disconnection from family or friends or anyone who would cause you to doubt or question or "critically study" Scientology or Hubbard or your "gains" is required. My two adult children have been required to be "disconnected" from me since 2000 when I left Scientology and returned to my Roman Catholic roots. Check out a video of me that was made in 2003 on www.religiousshunning.org. Many families have been destroyed by the disconnection policy of the Church of Scientology.
2. OCCULT: The subject is "occult" at its core. ("Occult" just means, secret or confidential.) Over half of the steps on the Scientology "Bridge" are confidential. The highest "grade", OT 8, is called "Truth Revealed". If truth is revealed at OT 8 then before that it must be hidden. Yes, there are nearly 40 million words (forty million!!) that are NOT occult but the core of it is. WHAT the "occult" information is is not the point. THAT there is "occult" information should be considered. Do you want to buy into a superstitous, primitive, childish system where you must be protected from certain information?
3. LIES: SInce, "YOU CANNOT HANDLE THE TRUTH!!" You must be told "acceptable truths". What is the difference between an "acceptabl truth" and a half-truth or a lie? Also it is an axiom in the Scientology philosophy that nothing (NOTHING) would exist without lies.
4. HYPNOSIS: Make sure you understand what "hypnosis" is (not just stage hypnosis). It is essentially deeply "focused attention". Nothing is wrong with hypnosis. Nothing is wrong with morphine or vodka either, but you sure better know if you are being given it. Hubbard denies that any hypnosis is ever used. That is simply a not true. You do not need "belief" in scientology because you will have "knowledge" instead. Knowledge is defined in Scientology as "certainty". Hypnotic techniques bring about "certainty" even when some bizarre logic is required to support it.
So what is the attraction? Excellent, superb, wonderful communication skills. Scientologists are superb listeners!! That is something that is so rare in this crazy world. As with most things in this world this is not a matter of 100% good or 100% bad. The disconnection, the hypnosis, the lies are all presented very gradually with superb and manipulative communication skills.
I will defend to my death the right to practice the Scientology religion, but advise all to approach it with great discernment.
L. Ron Hubbard states: "We will never betray your faith in us, so long as you are one of us." - The Aims of Scientology
Think about it.
Dave Sweetland
30 year member of the Church of Scientology (1969 - 2000)
Scientology Apostate since August 2000 (declared "Suppressive Person")
popsweetland@earthlink.net
Girl, what you know about Scientology wouldn't fit in an acorn. It sounds like you merely swallowed a bunch of glossy propaganda brochures and regurgitated the material.
It's a rather astonishing thing for a member of a media 'opinion staff.' Do a little more research. You'll be utterly embarrassed at having your name on this piece. I know I would!
http://www.xenutv.com/
See WWW.LERMANET.COM
Too many people assume "if this bit of technology works, it all works and the church is good." Or: "the church is doing these horrible things, the technology must be bad too." This is where you get strange arguments: "The tech works!" "No the church is bad!". Stop, you're both a lot correct.
If you have any curiosity in scientology, read some of the books but stay far, far away from the church. IMHO
Scientology/CSR front group proposed detox for armed services veterans
http://tinyurl.com/24aozq
critic: www.xenu.net
pro-Scientology: www.scientology.org
As for your article, well, it was certainly a fairer piece of journalism than some have written. Don't be dismayed by the critics' comments, their bitterness forces them to attack anything positive.
"PSYCHIATRY: GLOBAL OBLITERATION
SINCE PEOPLE ALREADY INSTINCTIVELY RECOGNIZE psychiatry as a whole track symbol of terror, when you raise public awareness about specific psychiatric crimes and abuses, you inevitably spark a firestorm of outrage. At this year's IAS Anniversary Event, we released an arsenal of new incendiary tools, with the riveting documentary release- Psychiatry: An Industry of Death-leading the charge.
[...]
AWAKENING EVERYONE TO THE HORROR OF PSYCHIATRY WITH THE BRUTAL
TRUTH...
When it comes to psychiatry, the strategy is simple. It comprises three carefully dovetailed steps. First, we awaken people to the unadulterated horror of psychiatry with a multichannel, public information campaign, including: books, documentaries, demonstrations and international exhibit tours.
Then we sign them on as Human Rights Investigators, arming them with anti-psych information packets, fact sheets, white papers and other suitably pointed materials. Whereupon we let slip the dogs of war - busting psychs, exposing psychs outlawing psychs, and otherwise unleashing all manner of actions exposing their criminality. All of which raises the temperature of public outrage to incendiary levels - and that's your worldwide anti-psych firestorm in the making."
Impact Magazine 115, December 2006
If Scientologists are so sane, why do they have this raging hatred of psychiatrists?
Is it because L Ron Hubbard said they've been pursuing us for the last 76 trillion years? (Technical Bulletin 22 July 1956. Please look it up, Scientologists )
See, some critics *have* studied Hubbard, and let me tell you, it's not a pretty sight.
Steve, that's just not true.
It's a very real and common-sense type subject that enables a person to understand themselves and others. It's very workable stuff and my experience with it is exactly as described by the author.
The teaching above "Clear" is kept secret from Scientologists until they reach this point. Part of that secret is revealed in this message as a public service. I believe people have a right to know where a prospective religion is going to take them, before, not after, they are "initiated".
At this point, Scientology is a "body thetan" removal service.
Body thetans are the ghosts of extraterrestials exported to Earth, which psychically infest our "thetan", i.e., the soul.
No proof has been offered, to date, that these "body thetans", in truth, do exist. Scientology promises that, once these body thetans are removed, and one goes up "The Bridge", one achieves "total freedom".
The price: Well, it's a lot, and I know someone who has spent $500,000 going all the way to OT8.
No matter how nice Scientologists are, how sincere they are, etc., what I have just written is a fact.
Nothing in this message denigrates Scientology, it just reports what it is.
You make your own judgement.
I have no problem with anyone persuing Scientology, but I do feel it is a public service to enlighten them about its true teaching, the teaching that they keep from the general public.
If someone wants to pursue Scientology, still, that's fine. Go for it. But the public has a right to know what they are going to be spending their money on.
I was never thrown out of Scientology, and I was a member of its elite corps called the "Sea Org". I was a Scientologist for nine years.
Thaddeus Gadfly
http://thaddeusgadfly.com
Fact is, your responsible for your own shit in your eyes.
I don't see your World, frankly.
We don't have to look back into a billion stars to see life lost, there are mysteries right here on Earth you can't confront and "remember".
Look at the Ancient Pyramids, I mean for real, go see them. It is so very likely you or I and we built them, and "forgot" about it!!
I mean, duh!
I'm not going to say more then this; Life isn't short, but your chance to save it really is.
Or just live it better, with basic basic. Why not?
Are you going to continue to stick your head up your ass? Many, even most, will.
In 1500 Personal Lectures LRH has given Hubbard never once said you or we're at fault.
Some people can really "get it". And some people just can't. It's as simple as that.
You just don't have it. Too bad, so sad. Whatever!
Don't blame me or us. STAMP! Your a "total prick!"
Flik, I've read your response.
You say "my chance to save it really is".
Scientologist are fond that they are out to "save the planet".
I'll tell you what I would like to save the planet from, and it is
those who go around "never fearing to hurt another in a just cause" (so
says L.R.H) in order to "save the planet".
Scientologists are very good at never offering sound refutations to an
argument, but resorting to ad hominems.
Thaddeus
And your contribution to the World is..??
Your carefully chosen words, rich fat ones like refutations (to refute) and ad hominem (Latin; a fallacy in argument such as changing the subject) in nonsense.
The answers for everyone are in Hubbard's written and spoken words, broadly available!
...;
Write a comment -->