April 10, 2013
Browse or download the PDF of our latest issue.

Students report new residence inspections

Process has been in place for years: Residence Services

Alex Migdal
Multimedia Editor
Apr 11, 2012

Students living in University of Alberta residences are reporting a new set of inspections following allegations of unsanitary living conditions in HUB Mall, but Residence Services is claiming the inspections have been in place for years. 

Notices of “quarterly health and safety” inspections started appearing on the doors of residences in mid-February, and residents are claiming they’ve never seen the inspections until recently. 

But Doug Dawson, executive director of Ancillary Services, said the inspections have always been in place, with a one-year hiatus leading up to February 2012 due to staffing issues.

The inspections occur in all residences except Campus St. Jean, Lister and Michener Park. They involve a thorough review of the entire unit, Dawson said, as opposed to typical check-in and check-out inspections, which focus on the student’s bedroom. In addition, they’re meant to occur every three months.

“It says they’re quarterly, but I’ve lived on campus for the last eight years and I’ve never had anything like this before,” said student Mildred Lau, a resident in East Campus Village for the past three years.

A Gateway article published on Feb. 15 outlined various unsanitary conditions affecting students living in HUB Mall, and included criticism from students on the inspections of units.

Lau said she received a notice of inspection for her East Campus Village unit on Feb. 15.

Part of the quarterly health and safety inspection notice states: “Living in an unsanitary and unsafe condition is against University Community Standards and therefore is considered a breach of lease, which may lead to termination of tenancy.”

Dawson dismissed claims that the inspections were related to the allegations.

“The relationship to the story, I’m sorry, is coincidental,” he said.

But Chelsea Butler, a two-year resident of East Campus Village, said it would be a “pretty wild coincidence” if that were the case.

“Especially for them to call it quarterly when it’s never happened before,” she added. “It seemed like they were sending a message that they were taking it more seriously now.”

Butler also received a quarterly health and safety inspection notice in late February, her first one in the two years she’s lived in East Campus Village.

The report Butler received following the inspection was thorough, she noted, including a recommendation to clean the inside of her oven.

“I’m glad they are starting to do it, because it’ll be a good way for them to avoid the conditions that are happening in HUB,” Butler said. 

When asked about long-term residents who claimed never having undergone the inspection, Dawson said the issue was likely due to a name change, although he was unsure of any previous names.

Student Miranda Woofenden said she’s kept all of her notices from Residence Services throughout her five years of living in HUB Mall, and was unable to find any notice that matched the description of the quarterly health and safety inspection.

The first time Woofenden heard of the inspection was when she received a notice of her own in late February. Regardless of its goal, Woofenden doesn’t believe the inspections will be of any use. 

“As it stands, I don’t think these inspections serve much of a purpose, and will be irrelevant until (Residence Services) takes the initiative to enforce and standardize their expectations in terms of cleanliness and procedures and consequences,” Woofenden said.

But Residence Services is always looking for ways to improve the student experience, Dawson said, noting there’s an “urgent” need for the university and student residents to co-operate.

“We do need students to get the right information in terms of cleanliness and keeping their units tidy. It makes it difficult,” Dawson said. “We don’t want a program of entering these suites every week. That’s in nobody’s best interest.”



Comments

Minor correction: I received the notice Feb 15, the afternoon of the day the previous article was published. This pushes it to “really strange coincidence”-level.

I have to agree with Miranda: When my unit received its detailed report, it was brought inside by a roommate and posted next to the front door (as I have made a habit of doing) and my roommates proceeded to pretend it never existed and cleaned absolutely nothing (!).



Posted by Mildred Lau on Apr 11, 2012

Hmm, that’s a few people now that I’ve heard received a detailed report after the inspection. My inspection day passed and no report was left in my unit, mailbox, or the front door. Add that to the fact that there was no trace of someone having entered the unit (like the bedroom doors not being locked when residence services employees must lock all doors upon leaving) leads me to think the inspection was not even done in my unit…



Posted by Miranda Woofenden on Apr 15, 2012

I just love the writers at Gateway… you’re so biased it’s just hilarious to even consider this “writing” as anything akin to journalism.
You pick a side (oh poor, suffering students) and fight it until the very end, ripping apart anyone who dares to come in your way. Put this comment on the front page of your “paper”. Oh no? Too scared?
Those students are either lying, or are like their roommates: they pretend the notices don’t exist. In which particular units do these “ECV” students live who claim to have never, ever received an inspection of this kind? Yeah, like any university student is THAT concerned with a piece of paper stuck to their door along with the tons of flyers…
THEY DO THESE INSPECTIONS OVER READING WEEK EVERY YEAR. Most universities or college campus offices do. (Look it up, or is “research” something that only applies to a writing an essay in your world?) Or at least they try to, since so many students probably must bitch and moan (“I’m studying during Reading Week, so don’t interrupt meeeeee. Waaaahhhh!”) You lying, back-stabbing, ungenerous assholes.
Do you HAVE ANY IDEA how much you must be hurting the over-worked and over-burdened people who have to deal with literally thousands of demanding and impatient students every single day? How about you attack the lying profs who promise us all tons of job opportunities once we’re done, and then when you get out into the “real, real world”, oopsie, back to barista at Starbucks.
Would you like that in a Venti?



Posted by public84 on May 03, 2012

Submit a comment

By submitting your comment here, you acknowledge that The Gateway reserves the right to publish your comment both online and in print. The Gateway also reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity when reprinted in the print edition, and to refuse publication (both online and in print) of any comment it deems racist, sexist, libellous or otherwise hateful in nature.

All comments must be approved by a moderator before they will be visible, and may take up to 48 hours to appear. Comments may be no longer than 5000 characters.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

daily dose

Board of Governors — May 10, 2013

05/13/2013

U of A and Students’ Union reach settlement over Lister policy changes

05/06/2013
latest blog post

Chivalry Should Die

05/02/2013

The remnants of chivalry still linger today, especially in the dating world.

most popular