Click for details.
April 11, 2012
Browse or download the PDF of our latest issue.

Native American activist argues for changes to Canada’s sustainability practices

Scott Fenwick
Gateway Staff
Feb 02, 2012

Canada’s approach to the environment and natural resources is wasteful and unsustainable, said prominent Native American activist and author Winona LaDuke, speaking to an audience of 300 people in the Telus Centre on Monday evening.

LaDuke, whose presentation was part of the University of Alberta’s International Week and Sustainability Speaker Series, said that the Native American relationship with the environment greatly differs from that of mainstream society.

“It’s a difference between making a living and making a killing, and by and large, this capitalistic system is set up to make a kill,” LaDuke said, referring to Canada’s over-harvesting of resource like fish and fossil fuels.

“There’s an entire absence of responsibility in the behaviour. It is only about rights and entitlement. Just because (you) have the right, because it was allocated to you by some government to over-harvest fish in the north Pacific, does not mean (that) you are entitled to it.”

LaDuke contrasted this point with traditional Native American culture, and proposed a paradigm shift, where humans give back to nature as much as they take from it.

Her notion of sustainability is less about economic growth and accumulation, and more about having sustainable and durable relations with the natural world.

“You have this reciprocal relationship, (and) there’s this set of responsibilities that’s associated with it,” LaDuke said. “You don’t have a title to take. You have this gift that is given to you, and you have responsibility.”

LaDuke said the main implication of this shift is about looking to the future, and that maintaining a reciprocal relationship with nature should ensure society’s long-term sustainability.  Previous bad decisions, she said, will be felt very soon — by 2020, 20 per cent of the world’s GDP will be spent dealing with the results of climate change.

LaDuke also said that there is an obvious difference of opinion between Native Americans and white society when it comes to forests — her reserve has fought in the past to keep forests standing in Minnesota, but white society views them by their monetary value.

“We live in a society that believes humans are entitled to the natural world,” she said. “No one else has equal standing or footing. So, if you are a fish in the Athabasca River, or a fish in the Columbia River, you don’t have much of a shot, because somehow there’s this perception of human entitlement that’s pervasive.”

Part of that entitlement, LaDuke said, is being wasteful with resources — Canadians use the most energy in the world on a per person basis.

She added that 57 per cent of all electricity generated in the United States goes to waste, given that it’s usually produced in a central location and sent long distances.

“In the United States and Canada, more money is made by the more you sell, not by how efficient you are,” Laduke said, adding that to achieve long-term sustainability, a greatly-decentralized power grid using wind energy is needed.

LaDuke closed her lecture by noting that future sustainability will need to go beyond what’s best for personal happiness. Instead, it will need to be about nature and all living things.

“It’s just not about me being happy. It’s a question of inter-generational justice, and inter-species justice, because an economy has to account for all of that. It cannot just be about us.”



Comments

Submit a comment

By submitting your comment here, you acknowledge that The Gateway reserves the right to publish your comment both online and in print. The Gateway also reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity when reprinted in the print edition, and to refuse publication (both online and in print) of any comment it deems racist, sexist, libellous or otherwise hateful in nature.

All comments must be approved by a moderator before they will be visible, and may take up to 48 hours to appear. Comments may be no longer than 5000 characters.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Now open
latest blog post

Winning at cheating: a not so comprehensive guide

03/30/2012

Life is hard. There’s no secret or manual — we’re all just sort of playing it by ear. There’s no right or wrong way to go through life, just an easy way and a hard way.  The hard way involves work, dedication, motivation, aggravation, archaeological excavation, rhyming skills, etc. So we can all agree the hard way is way too hard.  It’s clear you need to take the easy way out. After all, with great effort comes great responsibility.

most popular
latest multimedia

The Gateway Opinion Podcast Sells Out!



For the final show of the year, Ryan, Darcy and Adrian sit down for an hour and talk about stuff they like.

Oil City Roadhouse