April 10, 2013
Browse or download the PDF of our latest issue.

Bike lanes are on the right path

Ryan Stephens
Gateway Staff
Oct 03, 2012

Bicycle infrastructure has become a cause lately as more Edmontonians give up their vehicles in favour of the healthier two-wheel alternative. At the forefront of discussion is Whyte Avenue, with many calling upon the City of Edmonton to immediately ensure a safe and inclusive environment for pedestrians and cyclists. Though some people may feel cyclists should stay away from busy streets, Whyte Ave could prove to be the first major step in building an efficient and bike-friendly commuting system.

Motorists and cyclists don’t often jive on Edmonton’s busier streets. Space is tight, their speeds are at odds and one can never guess what the other will do. We need not look further back than a month ago for an example of the consequences of the current road-sharing situation. University student Isaak Kornelsen was killed on Whyte Avenue after being wedged between a parked vehicle and moving traffic, only to be pulled under a passing cement truck. Whyte Avenue being an unsuitable environment for bicyclists while being one of Edmonton’s major arteries has led to calls for the installation of bike lanes.

And anybody who’s driven down Whyte, precariously dodging cyclists as they stay as far right as they can, understands just how easily this type of accident could happen. Regardless of patience, it can be a massive distraction, and often prevents a smooth flow of traffic. The unpredictability of cars turning, parking and changing lanes forces motorists and cyclists into an unstable dance that could fall apart with an oblivious opening of a car door.

Some feel it’s the cyclists that should relent and stick to the side roads, but they shouldn’t have to detour and give up the sights and sounds of Whyte, seeing as they’re making the effort to improve both their health and the environment.

By eliminating street parking in favour of bike lanes, Edmonton would be taking yet another environmentally friendly step. With a lack of space to park, many would turn either to their bikes or public transit, joining the many Whyte Ave workers and shoppers who already rely on public or alternative transportation.

The most frequent criticism of increasing bicycle infrastructure centres is Edmonton’s short biking season. While our long, frigid winters certainly decrease the number of cyclists, there are still plenty who tough it out through the most unforgiving temperatures, and bike lanes on arterial roadways would only encourage more to ride their bikes year-round. By placing the lanes on the busier avenues such as Whyte, they would fall within the city’s network of winter plowing and sanding, ensuring they would be well enough maintained that cyclists should have no problem using them rather than the snow covered peripheral streets.

And keeping the cyclists off the main roads will only ensure they remain in the motorists’ peripheries. Rather, as the cycling population grows, the city needs to promote awareness, education and respect for both drivers and riders, and the only way this could be accomplished is for the bicycles to be right in the thick of things with their motor-driven brethren.

If Edmonton truly wants to promote bicycling, they should start with a bang rather than a whimper. While all of the current residential bike lanes have certainly helped, Whyte Avenue offers the opportunity to show how easily bicycles and cars can coexist with the help of proper planning. With a successful bike lane plan for Whyte Avenue, cycling will begin to spread throughout Edmonton, even on the busiest of our car-infested roads.



Comments

While I agree with Mr. Stephens that promoting cycling in Edmonton is a good idea, his essential argument for bike route on Whyte, a major thoroughfare, over 83rd and 81st is that:

“(cyclists) shouldn’t have to detour and give up the sights and sounds of Whyte, seeing as they’re making the effort to improve both their health and the environment.”

My counterpoint is that an effective solution would do more to promote usage of bicycles, that mixed usage is inefficient, and that bicycles on 83rd and 81st would be very effcient.

Just 3 km away from the edge “prime” cycling area 82nd avenue is a freeway with a speed limit of 100 km/hr, it is part of one the main cross-Edmonton routes that are used not just by lazy slobs who haven’t converted to biking, but by commercial, industrial and public transit.  Biking mixes poorly with large vehicles, why mix them when there is a perfectly good option one block north or south?  Do we need to add a biking lane to the Whitemud next?  We can do the Yellowhead afterwards.

83rd and 81st can be primarily purposed for cycling by setting up traffic controls so there is less stop/start for bikers, setting a speed limit for cars (that is STRICTLY enforced at maybe 30 km/hr for motorized vehicles and 40 km/hr for fast cyclists) and whatever other changes make life easier without mixing 165 lb vehicles going 30 km/hr with 10,000 lb vehicles going 50 km/hr.

This isn’t about the biking “community,” this isn’t about inclusion of some marginalized group, and this certainly isn’t about enjoying the sights and sounds of Whyte ave, this is about the safe and efficient transportation of people and goods to promote the functioning of our city.



Posted by Charles Heard on Oct 03, 2012

Submit a comment

By submitting your comment here, you acknowledge that The Gateway reserves the right to publish your comment both online and in print. The Gateway also reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity when reprinted in the print edition, and to refuse publication (both online and in print) of any comment it deems racist, sexist, libellous or otherwise hateful in nature.

All comments must be approved by a moderator before they will be visible, and may take up to 48 hours to appear. Comments may be no longer than 5000 characters.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

daily dose

Board of Governors — May 10, 2013

05/13/2013

U of A and Students’ Union reach settlement over Lister policy changes

05/06/2013
latest blog post

Chivalry Should Die

05/02/2013

The remnants of chivalry still linger today, especially in the dating world.

most popular