April 10, 2013
Browse or download the PDF of our latest issue.

Beer gardens miserably inadequate

Darcy Ropchan
Opinion Editor
Sep 12, 2012

Beer Gardens. The very mention of those words is enough to make any university student’s mouth water. It’s quite simple: section off a space outside and sell alcohol to students. Add some thumping live music and a general party atmosphere, and you’ve got a guaranteed crowd pleaser. It seems like a no-brainer way to make money off students, but this year’s beer gardens festivities were pathetic — a sad glimpse of what could have been.

The most obvious blunder of the beer gardens was that they closed at 6:30p.m. every day — with last call happening at 5:30. Why the event planners thought it would be a good idea to cut the beer flow off then is anyone’s guess. Besides, it doesn’t take anyone an hour to finish one cup of shitty beer.

It’s somewhat understandable that the beer gardens would have an early closing time on Wednesday and Thursday. A large majority of students are not likely to get drunk when they have class the next morning. But closing at 6:30? That’s a little much. It’s doubtful that anyone — especially university students — has a bedtime that early. It makes sense to assume that if the gardens stayed open a few hours later, many students would still attend and make the event a financial success. Selling alcohol is a definite moneymaker.

Perhaps the most egregious part of the beer gardens was that they closed at their regular time on a Friday — one of the few days of the week designated for partying. If there’s any day or time a student is going to look for a chance to cast off the worries of school and maybe have a few drinks, it’s going to be a Friday evening.

Well, they were supposed to close at their regular time. Some friends and I tried to enter the beer gardens on Friday at 5:15, long before last call, but we were quite rudely sent away by a security guard whose condescending explanation was simply: “We’re done.”

Well no, we weren’t done. We weren’t even started. Not only that, but a performer was still on stage and the inside, so cruelly denied to us, was full of happy students with drinks aplenty. So instead of throwing our money away on campus, we were forced to visit a bar off campus — because hell if we’re going to try RATT on the first Friday of classes. If the people working an event aren’t going to work for it, and make it seem like they’re happy to see us and accept our money, then we aren’t going to give it to them.

Of course, this sour experience was courtesy of only a small group of employees working the event and whoever made the decision to close off the entrance. I’m positive that most staff and volunteers helping to put on the event were quite pleasant and more than happy to deal with customers. A shame: it only takes one person to ruin someone’s experience.

If we want the beer gardens to be an event worth attending, the organizers need to assess their clientele and adjust their business model accordingly.
It’s great the beer gardens opened early at 11a.m. Students have varying schedules so it’s helpful to have hours that cater to their differing hours. But that sentiment goes both ways. Some students don’t get off class that early, and others work or have other commitments.
And think of all those brave student group volunteers who, instead of getting smashed after class at 3 p.m. each day, dutifully sat at a table until 5 p.m. in the name of that most holy student ideal: involvement.

It’s hardly too much to ask that the gardens stay open a few hours later into the night so students can unwind. Especially on a Friday.



Comments

Long time reader, infrequent commenter. Who was behind the planning and sponsoring of such an event as these “beer gardens”? If its the SU then you don’t have to explain any further. The ineptitude speaks for itself. If some drinking establishments like Hudsons, RATT, or Dewey’s involved (sponsoring) then I’d definitely stress the point of closing the beer gardens at 6:30. Pre-drunk students let out of the beer gardens around supper time definitely equates to spending more money on beer and food at the nearest watering holes. There’s also that whole curbing public drunkenness thing, but that should be saved for another time.



Posted by Brad C on Sep 12, 2012

I can assure you that once inside the beer gardens they were a wicked time. Theearly closure probably had something to do with liquor licenses or requests or guidelines from the university. They were absolutely packed Friday afternoon and the Arkells played a super fun show. It was like a giant chill patio and the last meaningful infusion of beer and sunshine. You can go and guzzle beers with music and students at anytime throughout the year. Your opinion just reeks of sour grapes.



Posted by brian on Sep 12, 2012

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that any combination of the following 3 factors dictate how long beer gardens can last, and how long before closing they have to stop selling booze:
1) Alberta Liquor Laws
2) The Fact that the University owns the land (Quad) and the liquor licence, and can dictate to the SU how long a bunch of beer-loving undergrads can hang around the middle of campus.
3) The SU’s ability to find enough people willing to accept minimum wage in exchange for standing around watching their peers get plastered during the first week of classes.



Posted by GH on Sep 13, 2012

As someone that has dealt with the SU planning events for a campus club, this makes complete sense to me. I have planned many bar fundraiser nights and told Student Group Services about it. They have to be the ultimate kill joy on the university campus. They tell you that everyone attending has to sign a waiver to attend. A public location, and they want me to get all attendees to sign waivers regarding drinking and related risks. This is ridiculous. With some strong words they usually back down, but could you imagine signing waivers to get into Hudsons. The student body and society in general need to take the responsibility into its own hands for once. Rant done.



Posted by S. Dizzy on Sep 19, 2012

Submit a comment

By submitting your comment here, you acknowledge that The Gateway reserves the right to publish your comment both online and in print. The Gateway also reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity when reprinted in the print edition, and to refuse publication (both online and in print) of any comment it deems racist, sexist, libellous or otherwise hateful in nature.

All comments must be approved by a moderator before they will be visible, and may take up to 48 hours to appear. Comments may be no longer than 5000 characters.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

daily dose

Board of Governors — May 10, 2013

05/13/2013

U of A and Students’ Union reach settlement over Lister policy changes

05/06/2013
latest blog post

Chivalry Should Die

05/02/2013

The remnants of chivalry still linger today, especially in the dating world.

most popular